Cases 1 - 10 of 38
BARNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03337
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L. BARNES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and HON. FRANK P. GERACI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOURNING v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LEE MOURNING
Defendant:
JOHN BROWN, HANS FRANK, MILDRED SUSAN BATEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. KENDALL et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Petitioner:
JAMIE L. BROWN
Respondent:
FRANK KENDALL and THOMAS SHUBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
BRADIN et al v. CARVAJAL et al
as 1:2020cv03104
Respondent:
JACKSON, HOLST, WILBURN and others
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ROSS, RAYMOND GAJEWSKI, SCOTT HOWIE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MABRY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2020cv00868
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
FRANK MABRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VOTH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00413
Plaintiff:
FRANK E. VOTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
BAILEY v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2019cv03178
Petitioner:
THOMAS LEE BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GEN, NBCI WARDEN FRANK BISHOP, MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENT v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02189
Defendant:
J. F. CARAWAY, FRANK LARA, BUNKER and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
