Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Stampone #713769 v. Parnall Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stampone #713769
Defendant:
Parnall Correctional Facility, Noah Nagy, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon #158463 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Frederick Lamar Dixon #158463
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, Randee Rewerts, Unknown Hitchingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Atkins #333064 v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Frederick Nigel Atkins #333064
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Catherine Bauman, Jeff Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris #162928 v. Crompton et al
as 1:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Morris #162928
Defendant:
Robert Crompton, Nikki Monroe and Jack Bellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stampone #713769 v. Michigan Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stampone #713769
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Julie Clement, Michigan Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passarelli #954240 v. Gibbons et al
as 1:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Passarelli #954240
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Tracey Gibbons, Dale J. Hilson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowser v. Watson et al
as 2:2023cv10568
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bowser
Defendant:
Peter Watson, David Shaver, Timothy Ryder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
