Cases 1 - 10 of 57
(PC) Good v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Good
Defendant:
Patty Pearson, Michael Richlin, Alicia Richlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Good v. Shasta County Sheriff Dept
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Good
Defendant:
Shasta County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel D. Good v. Department of Justice Superior Courts et al
as 2:2024cv02713
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Good, Jr. and Samuel Dennis Good
Defendant:
Department of Justice Superior Courts, Moulten, Elizabeth Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Good Jr v. People of State of California
as 2:2024cv02649
Petitioner:
Samuel Good, Jr.
Respondent:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goods v. Javate
as 5:2024cv01423
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Defendant:
Rosana Javate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Goods v. Baughman et al
as 2:2023cv02790
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Defendant:
David Baughman, C. Lacy, B. Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goode v. Canejo et al
as 3:2021cv02054
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Dennis Goode
Defendant:
J. Canejo and John & Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Good v. California State Prison - Solano et al
as 2:2021cv01653
Plaintiff:
Ravon Good
Defendant:
California State Prison - Solano and G. Matteson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dashawn L. Good v. Felicia Ponce
as 2:2020cv04956
Respondent:
Felicia Ponce
Petitioner:
Dashawn L. Good
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tampico v. Meyer et al
as 4:2020cv02713
Defendant:
Paul Meyer, Unknown Alameda County District Attorney, Timothy Painter and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tampico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
