Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Turner, Officer Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. The Good Old Boys Domestic Terrorists' Organization et al
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Dante' Corvette Stone
Defendant:
The Good Old Boys Domestic Terrorists' Organization, Commonwealth Executive Branch and KY D.O.C. Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
Jailer James A. Daley, Lt. Hoyer, Maj. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goods v. Daley
as 2:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Respondent:
James A. Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goods v. Daley
as 2:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Respondent:
James A. Daley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goods v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 2:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky and Kenton County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Dante' Corvette Stone
Defendant:
Ann Bailey Smith, David Green, John Minton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Quintana et al
as 5:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Willie Earl Brown
Defendant:
Francisco Quintana, Robert Williams, Francisco Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
George v. Rector et al
as 5:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
James Edward George, Jr.
Defendant:
Rector, Michael Long, Scott Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Ballard et al
as 5:2016cv00482
Plaintiff:
James Edward George, Jr.
Defendant:
Rodney Ballard, Don Bottom, Chad Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
