Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Hooks v. Matushak et al
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin Hooks
Defendant:
Rachel Matushak, James A Elsinger, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00709
Petitioner:
Deangelo M Garcia
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Mitchell v. Racine Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
Kristopher DeWitt Mitchell
Defendant:
Racine Police Department, Michael C Seeger, Juan F Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman, Garcia v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00568
Petitioner:
Garcia Coleman
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Judge W. Andrew Voight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Brown County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Garcia and Jose Calouro Raul Ernesto Garcia
Defendant:
Brown County Jail, Kevin Smith, Emily Hoerter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitzpatrick v. Fairchild et al
as 2:2021cv00978
Plaintiff:
Dequarius D Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Sgt Fairchild and CO Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claypool v. Evers et al
as 2:2021cv00571
Defendant:
Angela Thompson, Austin J Korman, Kira Labby and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant K Claypool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Eplett
as 2:2021cv00478
Petitioner:
Rodolfo J Garcia
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Cooper
as 2:2021cv00215
Defendant:
Sarah Cooper
Petitioner:
Rodolfo J Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
