Cases 1 - 10 of 239
Mullinax et al v. Griffin et al
as 0:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Trevor Mullinax and Tammy Beason
Defendant:
Michael Griffin, Daniel Taggart, Gary Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
White v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02595
Petitioner:
Gary A. White, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Stonebreaker et al
as 1:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
Gary Jason Griffin
Defendant:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker, Jr, Associate Warden Gause, Associate Warden Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Knight v. Wilkins
as 8:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Gary Knight and Gary Rowland Knight
Defendant:
Walter Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Carter v. Whitesides et al
as 0:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Carter
Defendant:
John Brad Whitesides, Capt. Eric Jaillette and Lancaster Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Morris v. Richland County et al
as 3:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Kevin Morris
Defendant:
Richland County, Sheriff Leon Lott, Kyle Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garland v. USA
as 8:2023cv00112
Petitioner:
Gary Garland
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Knight v. Clark et al
as 8:2022cv04511
Plaintiff:
Gary Rowland Knight and Gary Knight
Defendant:
Rick Clark and Drew Cisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Singletary v. Warden Jackson
as 3:2022cv04362
Plaintiff:
Charles Gary Singletary, III
Defendant:
Warden Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Singletary v. Warden Jackson
as 9:2022cv04362
Plaintiff:
Charles Gary Singletary, III
Defendant:
Warden Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
