Cases 1 - 10 of 271
Ravenscroft v. Office of the Fredrick County Comissions et al
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Ravenscroft, Jr
Defendant:
Office of the Fredrick County Comissions, Office of the Attorney for the Commonwealth, Office of the Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary-Bey v. United States Federal Corporation et al
as 7:2024cv00281
Petitioner:
Gregory Tyrone Gary-Bey
Respondent:
United States Federal Corporation and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elyas v. Shepherd, et al
as 1:2024cv00405
Defendant:
Sameer Mohamed Elyas, Gary Shepherd and V. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Back
as 7:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Gary Matthew Hudson
Respondent:
Warden Back
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv81547
Petitioner:
Gary Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rimmer v. USA
as 3:2024cv81546
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Rimmer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rimmer v. Schneider et al
as 7:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Rimmer
Defendant:
Michael Schneider, Hally Vradenburgh, Esq. and T. Brotta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Gary B. Williams
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunley v. Bilter, et al
as 7:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
Gary Nunley
Defendant:
Unknown, Johny Bilter, Trish McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunley v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Gary Nunley
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
