Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Titus Henderson v. Gary Hamblin, et al
as 24-1757
Plaintiff:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant:
GARY HAMBLIN, TIM HAINES, Superintendent, RICHARD S. SCHNEITER and others
Henderson, Titus v. Hamblin, Gary et al
as 3:2021cv00346
Defendant:
Ellen Ray, Richard Schneiter, U.S. Att. General Gary Hamblin and others
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson, Titus v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2020cv01063
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin, Capt. Brudos, Lebeus Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Titus Henderson
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney, Joshua v. Hepp, Randall et al
as 3:2019cv00662
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Marc W. Clements, Gary Hamblin and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua N. McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgenbottom, Delante v. Hepp, Randall et al
as 3:2019cv00509
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Marc W. Clements, Gary Hamblin and others
Plaintiff:
Delante Higgenbottom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob, Christopher v. Hamblin, Gary et al
as 3:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jacob
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , Edward Walls , Michael Miesner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Murphy et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Keith Jackson
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy, Gary Hamblin, Edward Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sylvester Jackson v. Randall Hepp, et al
as 17-1221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVESTER JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL HEPP, JUDY P. SMITH, DEBRA BOYD and others
Porter v. Jess et al
as 2:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter
Defendant:
Cathy Jess , James Schwochert, Gary Hamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson, Sylvester v. Hepp, Randall et al
as 3:2016cv00542
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Jackson
Defendant:
Randall Hepp , Judy Smith, Debra Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
