Cases 1 - 10 of 77
SAUERWINE v. HOLIHAN et al
as 5:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SAUERWINE
Defendant:
GAVIN P. HOLIHAN and RICHARD COBLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. REICHLEY et al
as 5:2020cv04831
Defendant:
JUDGE DOUGLAS G. REICHLEY, ATTORNEY GAVIN HOLIHAN and ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR LISA RENE CIPOLETTI
Plaintiff:
CARLOS GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUERWINE v. HALIHAN
as 5:2020cv02709
Defendant:
ESQUIRE GAVIN P. HALIHAN and GAVIN P. HALIHAN
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SAUERWINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01441
Defendant:
WETZEL, DIRECTOR OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICE UNIT, S.C.I. WAYMART, U.M. KAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHAVIS and RONALD CHAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BULLARD et al v. SMEAL et al
as 2:2019cv01186
Defendant:
SHELIA MOORE SMEAL, DAVID CLOSE, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES FOY BULLARD and ABDUL IDEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2018cv02357
Defendant:
Huffman, Scott Miller, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv02180
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jones
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, Michael Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R.B. v. Hollibaugh et al
as 1:2016cv01075
Plaintiff:
R.B.
Defendant:
Lisa Hollibaugh, Jon D. Fisher, Jay Whitesel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Wilson
Defendant:
Rhonda Ellett, Lori White, McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. GAVIN et al
as 2:2015cv00565
Petitioner:
VITO HUNTER
Respondent:
WAYNE GAVIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
