Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Riggin v. Fiorilli et al
as 9:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Chandler Joseph Riggin
Defendant:
Joanna Fiorilli, John Doe #1-5 and Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilgore v. Goodman
as 9:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Steven M. Kilgore
Respondent:
D. Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dove v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Dove
Defendant:
D.O.C.C.S., Daniel F. Martuscello, III, Greene Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Burke et al
as 1:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
James M. Burke, D. Goodman and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Goodman
as 2:2024cv01353
Petitioner:
Jua Smith
Respondent:
Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stokes v. Goodman
as 9:2023cv00813
Petitioner:
James E. Stokes
Respondent:
Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. Goodman
as 1:2023cv04762
Petitioner:
David Ramos
Respondent:
Superintendent Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rizzuto v. Annucci et al
as 1:2022cv07698
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Rizzuto
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, John J. Morley, MD, Lynn J. Lilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonet v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 1:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Michelle Nicole Bonet
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, A. Annucci, D. Venettozzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Joblove et al
as 1:2021cv03686
Defendant:
Leonard Joblove, Eric Gonzalez and Howard Goodman
Plaintiff:
Christopher Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
