Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01165
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Poole v. Hurwitz et al
as 6:2023cv06927
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole
Defendant:
Hugh J Hurwitz, Director J Gordon and Jack J Joiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Shook et al v. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources et al
as 4:2023cv05027
Plaintiff:
Dana Shook and Lewis Bennett
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office, Kyle Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Vickery v. McBride et al
as 8:2023cv01874
Plaintiff:
Russell Gordon Vickery
Defendant:
Chad McBride, Joshua D Black, D. Simmone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Poole v. Gordon
as 6:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole
Defendant:
J Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Smith v. Tobey et al
as 6:2022cv02666
Plaintiff:
Khammesherma Smith
Defendant:
Jeremie Tobey, Gordon Thomas and Unknown Members of Cypress I/M
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cromer v. Richland County et al
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Desmond Cromer
Defendant:
Richland County, Marcus A. Burnette, Signeous Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loyola v. Baker et al
as 6:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Miguel Loyola
Defendant:
Mary Gordon Baker, Captain Carter, M. Lavorando and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loyola v. Baker et al
as 2:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Miguel Loyola
Defendant:
Mary Gordon Baker, Captain Carter, M. Lavorando and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin v Warden N. Barnes
as 0:2021cv04147
Petitioner:
Gordon Benjamin
Respondent:
Warden N. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
