Cases 1 - 10 of 544
Deptula v. Greene
as 3:2024cv01579
Petitioner:
Sebastian Deptula
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GREEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv04736
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00247
Defendant:
DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION, SCI GREENE, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
JACK ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jack v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv01495
Defendant:
Sean McCorkle, McCulley, Suydam and others
Plaintiff:
Nygel Jack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goss v. Warden Greene
as 3:2024cv01133
Petitioner:
Ronald Goss
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joseph v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01483
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Francis F. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joseph v. Greene
as 3:2024cv01483
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Francis F. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alward v. Allenwood LSCI et al
as 3:2024cv01204
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Jeffrey Greene, Amy Boncher, T. Noon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROGERS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON et al
as 2:2024cv01210
Petitioner:
LANCE ROGERS
Respondent:
WARDEN SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Renninger v. Greene
as 4:2024cv01425
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Scott Allen Renninger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
