Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Scanlan et al v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
Michael Scanlan, Nedaal Hamud, Travis Lewis and others
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Shelby County Jail Division, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locke et al v. McMinn County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Billy W. Locke, Pam Locke and Angie Thomas
Defendant:
McMinn County Jail, Securus Phone Comp., Rye Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sowah v. Guy et al
as 1:2021cv00218
Plaintiff:
Richard Sowah
Defendant:
Joe Guy, McMinn County Sheriffs Office, Lt Jason Bautsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Guy et al
as 3:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Tim Carver, Sheriff Joe Guy and McMinn County Sheriff Dept
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Southern Health Partners
as 3:2019cv00124
Plaintiff:
Guy R Jenkins, III
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Berrong et al
as 3:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Jim Berrong, Chief Kenteell and Mayor Mitchell
Plaintiff:
Guy R Jenkins, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Scruggs et al
as 2:2019cv02230
Plaintiff:
Tarius Guy and Tarius Scott
Defendant:
Larry Fitzgerald and Chris Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. McMinn County Justice Center et al
as 1:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
Donnie Lee Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Guy, K Stansberry, Dr. Trennum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Stansberry et al
as 1:2018cv00256
Defendant:
McMinn County, Joe Guy, Kathy Stansberry and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jason Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
