Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rodgers v. Hansen
as 3:2023cv05322
Plaintiff:
Ronald G. Rodgers
Defendant:
Jeffery B. Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Brooks v. Merchant et al
as 3:2023cv01987
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reginald Brooks
Defendant:
David Merchant, Shannon Perkins, Sumter County Emergency Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brooks v. City of Sumter, S.C. et al
as 3:2023cv01665
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reginald Brooks
Defendant:
City of Sumter, S.C., David Werchat, Earnest A. Finneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cardenas v. Jenson
as 6:2022cv03700
Petitioner:
Orlando Juarez Cardenas
Respondent:
Hansen Jenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Janson
as 4:2022cv01365
Petitioner:
Ulysses Williams
Respondent:
Warden Hansen Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Earl v. Hansen et al
as 1:2020cv03907
Defendant:
Warden Bryan K. Dobbs, Warden B. H. Romero, Celia Hansen and others
Plaintiff:
Leandre Earl and Le'Andre Earl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemmons v. United States of America et al
as 0:2016cv01305
Plaintiff:
Sean Christopher Clemmons
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden Hudson, Amy Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01059
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00198
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hansen v. Warden Wateree River Correctional Institution
as 6:2011cv02670
Petitioner:
Phillip A Hansen
Respondent:
Warden Wateree River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
