Cases 1 - 10 of 89
TAYLOR v. PLATT et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRETT TAYLOR
Defendant:
DAVID PLATT, OJO, EMMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRADY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
JULIAN DEVELL GRADY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, KEITH HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. PLATT et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. CLARK, II
Defendant:
CHAD PLATT, KEITH HARTZELL, PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORGEY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERBERT FORGEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartzell v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv03034
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Hartzell, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PAYNE v. IDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
LEMONTE E. PAYNE
Defendant:
IDOC, PRATT and HARTZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. STIEN et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
NARVEL WHITFIELD
Defendant:
STIEN, HARTZEL, ABNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIDDLETON v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Defendant:
EMERSON, AUSTIN, HARTZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartzell v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Shawn Tosh Hartzell
Respondent:
Nethanjah Breitenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Pannell v. Sarah Eads, et al
as 23-2990
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PANNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH EADS, KEITH HARTZELL, ROBERT CARTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
