Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Ward v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Shelby Kenard Ward
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baisi v. Hoffman et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Heather Grimmett and Travis Hoffman
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marty v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00344
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Heather Marty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Posey v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Defendant:
Nancy E. Oldaker, John/Jane Doe, Heather Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Dakota Allen Posey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Heather Ray and FBOP Director Collette Peters
Plaintiff:
Joseph I. Patterson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hill v. Government for the State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of West Virginia, F.C.I. Hazelton and Warden Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witt v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Heather Witt
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Blackwell v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Norman Blackwell
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. Ray (Warden)
as 5:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Maurice Moore
Respondent:
Heather Ray (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abraham v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
Daniel Abraham
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
