Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Vazquez v. Norwood et al
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Samuel Cedeno Vazquez
Defendant:
Norwood, Moreno and Holloman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashlock v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Marrio Drantrell Ashlock
Defendant:
Amarshay Johnson, Ahtreyonna Holloman and Ty-Quann Alston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Rick White, D. Turner, Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Philippe
as 8:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
Darious Holloman
Defendant:
Matthey Philippe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lamonte Holloman
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Division of Risk Management
as 7:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lamonte Holloman
Defendant:
Division of Risk Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Virginia Department of Correction et al
as 7:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lamonte Holloman
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Correction and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloman v. Virginia Department of Correction et al
as 7:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lamonte Holloman
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Correction and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
