Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Goods v. Daley et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Deputy Turner, Deputy Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Greene v. Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Randolph County, Jim Justice, Betsy C. Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Feaster et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Sidney Feaster, Governor Jim Justice, Randolph County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Mineral County, West Virginia
as 1:2016cv10562
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Hamilton
Defendant:
Mineral County, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Alex Hamilton
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, West Virginia Division Of Corrections, Salem Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
Alex Hamilton
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Salem Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv05806
Petitioner:
John Hamilton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hamilton v. State of West Virginia
as 1:2016cv03765
Plaintiff:
Charles K. Hamilton
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mutafis v. North Central Regional Jail et al
as 5:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael Theodore Mutafis
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
