Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
HANCOCK v. BOOHER et al
as 2:2023cv01657
Petitioner: ERIC D. HANCOCK
Respondent: BRADLEY BOOHER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent: Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner: Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant: CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff: Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv00954
Defendant: DAN HANCOCK, SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. White We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00687
Petitioner: Thomas Hancock
Respondent: White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HANCOCK v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2014cv01423
Petitioner: ERIC HANCOCK
Respondent: TAMMY FERGUSON and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRACEY v. RENDELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00217
Plaintiff: COREY BRACEY
Defendant: RENDELL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HASTINGS v. JOHN HANCOCK et al
as 2:2011cv04063
Plaintiff: GEORGE HASTINGS
Defendant: JOHN HANCOCK and FIREMAN'S INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROMWELL v. HANCOCK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00068
Plaintiff: ANDRE LAMONT CROMWELL
Defendant: JOHN HANCOCK, JAMES MARKLEY, THE CITY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?