Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Holland v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Derrico D. Holland
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DAVIS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
QYMOAN DAVIS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF GEORGIA, Warden REAGAN BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUDD v. JONES et al
as 4:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
DAWUAN TERRELL MUDD and DIVINE SERENITY MOON
Defendant:
WARDEN DESHAWN JONES, SGT JUAN USQUIANO, LT PERNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. HOLLAND et al
as 5:2021cv00139
Defendant:
SERGEANT A ELLIS, UNIT MANAGER RUFUS LOGAN, SMU UNIT MANAGER ROLAND and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. MATTHEWS et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN TOMMY COFFEE, WARDEN FORD, UNIT MANAGER RUFUS LOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00764
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Robert Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lee v. Harmon et al
as 1:2020cv00746
Defendant:
Warden D. J. Harmon, Officer Pettway, Lt. Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Antrantrino Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CRUTCHLEY et al v. SULLENS et al
as 4:2019cv00215
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY, JIMMY WESLEY PARKER, HEATHER CRUTCHLEY and others
Defendant:
Sergeant HOLLAND and CERT Officer SULLENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crutchley et al v. Sullens et al
as 3:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Cert/Sgt Holland and Cert. Officer Sullens
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Parker and Adam Crutchley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. HOLLAND et al
as 4:2019cv00171
Plaintiff:
JIMMY WESLEY PARKER
Defendant:
CERT Officer SULLENS and Sergeant HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
