Cases 1 - 10 of 41
HORN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
GARY HORN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTING v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HARTING
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, TYLER JUGG, JONATHAN GRIMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORNS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv01709
Petitioner:
VINCENT HORNS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKE EL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR (A.R.C.), A. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HORNS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv02406
Petitioner:
VINCENT HORNS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HORNS v. HENDRICKS COUNTY POLICE et al
as 1:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
VINCENT HORNS
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY POLICE, HENDRICKS COUNTY SHERIFF, BOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAKUR v. KLINK et al
as 2:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
RASHEED SHAKUR
Defendant:
B. KLINK, J. SCHMELENSEE and J. HORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAKUR v. HORN
as 2:2021cv00307
Defendant:
RASHEED G. SHAKUR and J. HORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00297
Defendant:
JENSEN, BLACKMAN, D. RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORNE v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Defendant:
CHELSEA MORRISON, VANDERBURGH COUNTY, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
ANTOIN MARIO HORNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
