Cases 1 - 10 of 60
GINDRAW v. SANFORD et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
TAHMIR GINDRAW
Defendant:
LT. SANFORD and LT. HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Garza
as 1:2023cv01483
Petitioner:
Derrick Houston
Respondent:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gomes v. USP Allenwood PA et al
as 2:2023cv01131
Petitioner:
James Gomes
Respondent:
USP Allenwood PA and Houston House
Defendant:
THOMAS FISCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WELLS v. HOUSTON et al
as 2:2022cv01641
Plaintiff:
ERIC DANTE WELLS
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT HOUSTON, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Felton et al
as 3:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
Shariem Houston
Defendant:
Atari Felton, Michael Ott, Claude Mease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor v. Levan et al
as 1:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
William Victor
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Levan, Correctional Officer Macijckak, Correctional Officer Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSTON v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE et al
as 3:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
NAIFEECE HOUSTON
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and WARDEN OF SCI HOUTZDALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOUSTON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2021cv04015
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOUSTON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER G. WILLIAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER M. ORTIZ and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TOWNSVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00970
Defendant:
Sgt. Bower, Lt. Trevethan, Dr. Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruoss v. Nicholas et al
as 1:2021cv00232
Defendant:
Lt. Rohland, Mr. Buck, Major Michael Rowe and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Anne Ruoss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
