Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Ortuno-Perez v. ICE Field Office Director
as 2:2023cv00344
Petitioner:
Santiago Ortuno-Perez
Respondent:
ICE Field Office Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Guillen v. ICE Health Service Corp et al
as 3:2022cv05894
Plaintiff:
Noel Hernandez Guillen
Defendant:
ICE Health Service Corp, Ashok Mallya and Sofya Gancharova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillen v. ICE Health Service Corps et al
as 2:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Noel Hernandez Guillen
Defendant:
ICE Health Service Corps, MD Mallya Ashok and RN Sofya Gancharova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Assane v. ICE Field Office Director
as 2:2017cv01240
Petitioner:
Coulibaly Cedric Assane
Respondent:
ICE Field Office Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hanif v. ICE Field Office Director
as 2:2017cv01238
Petitioner:
Edneil Hanif
Respondent:
ICE Field Office Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Yasin v. ICE Detention & Removal Operations
as 2:2017cv00237
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Yasin
Defendant:
ICE Detention & Removal Operations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pius v. ICE Field Office Director
as 2:2016cv01353
Petitioner:
Diego Pius
Respondent:
ICE Field Office Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gutierrez v. ICE
as 2:2015cv01375
Petitioner:
Victor Nunez Gutierrez
Respondent:
ICE Field Office Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2015cv00200
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2015cv00186
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
