Cases 1 - 10 of 94
COOK v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 2:2024cv00407
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Petitioner:
DANNY COOK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. INDIANA PAROL BOARD
as 1:2024cv01388
Petitioner:
JAMES J. JOHNSON
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROL BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HART v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2024cv01281
Defendant:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Petitioner:
DANIEL C. KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson, III v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
David Edward Jackson, III
Defendant:
Warden
Respondent:
Indiana Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TURNER v. REGAL et al
as 1:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
SPENCER TURNER
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REGAL, MARK SEVIER, J. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
DERRICK CHARLES LEAUNDRE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANTU v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2023cv01134
Petitioner:
ANTONIO CANTU, SR.
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
