Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Irvine v. McCarthy
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Darren Irvine
Defendant:
Major Unknown McCarthy
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Irvine v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Darren Irvine
Defendant:
Major Unknown McCarthy, Billie Sollie, Nurse Mary Joe Unknown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lang et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mitchell, Charlie Harris, Alexander Jones and others
Defendant:
Wendall Banks, Centurion of Mississippi, LLC, Brenda S. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00079
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Antwan Jones, Earthaleen Brown Smith, Sheriff Jimmy Fly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hill v. Hill et al
as 3:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Paul A. Hill, Frank W. Hill, William Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobo v. Irvin et al
as 3:2017cv00568
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Bobo
Defendant:
L. T. Irvin, K. Gooden and J. Leaper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Banks et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Irvin Kenneth Clark
Defendant:
Jacquline Banks, R. Woodall and Mike Hatten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Woodall et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Ronald E. Woodall, Charlene McCleave, James Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hazel v. Warden, FCI Yazoo City Low
as 3:2015cv00907
Plaintiff:
Irvin Maurice Hazel
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Yazoo City Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hill v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jerry Williams, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
