Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wakefield v. S.C. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 9:2020cv00132
Plaintiff:
Antonio Tykeish Wakefield
Defendant:
Lt. J. Thomas, S.C. Dept. of Corrections and Jason Perks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millholland v. Cywnar et al
as 8:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
James Millholland
Defendant:
Officer Cywnar , Officer Stevens, Chief of Police City of Belton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drummond v. Spartanburg County Detention Center et al
as 5:2015cv02147
Plaintiff:
Edward Terrick Drummond
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center, Capt Freeman, Det Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chestnut v. Thomas
as 1:2013cv02249
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Chestnut
Respondent:
J Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Clark et al
as 4:2011cv03346
Plaintiff:
Corey Jawan Robinson
Defendant:
T Clark, D Bailey, J Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Clark et al
as 5:2011cv03346
Plaintiff:
Corey Jawan Robinson
Defendant:
T Clark, D Bailey, J Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Byer et al
as 8:2011cv02834
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dieargo Patterson
Defendant:
Bill Byer, Wayne McCabe, Fred Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00467
Plaintiff:
Haley J Thomas
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon Ozmint, John Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Thomas v. Eagleton
as 2:2009cv01344
Petitioner:
Haley J Thomas
Respondent:
Willie Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Starling v. United States of America et al
as 8:2008cv00888
Plaintiff:
John B Starling
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
