Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Carlos Almeida v. Clark Ducart, et al
as 17-16302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS ALMEIDA
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, R. BELL, Assistant Warden, D. GONGORA and others
Ruben Valdez v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 16-16948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections, California Department of Corrections, TIM V. VIRGA, Warden, L. JOHNSON-DOVEY, Associate Warden, CSP-Sacramento and others
Ellis v. Heal et al
as 5:2015cv03287
Plaintiff:
Randall E. Ellis
Defendant:
E. Heal, J. Frisk, S. Niehus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben Valdez v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-15758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, TIM VIRGA, Warden, L. JOHNSON-DOVEY, Associate Warden, CSP-Sacramento and others
Sandoval v. Barneburg et al
as 5:2012cv03007
Plaintiff:
Alfred Arthur Sandoval
Defendant:
D. Barneburg, J. Beeson, C. Countess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. Cate et al
as 2:2012cv01352
Plaintiff:
Ruben Valdez
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Tim Virga, L. Johnson-Dovey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chance v. Cate et al
as 3:2011cv04279
Plaintiff:
David Chance
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, Robert A. Horel, Francisco Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfred Sandoval v. D. Barneburg, et al
as 11-15024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED ARTHUR SANDOVAL
Defendant - Appellee:
D. BARNEBURG, Sergeant, J. BEESON, Sergeant, C. COUNTESS, Correctional Officer and others
Zarate v. Horel et al
as 4:2010cv04727
Petitioner:
Manuel Zarate
Respondent:
Robbert A. Horel, J. Beeson, D. E. Milligan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zubiate v. Cate et al
as 5:2010cv04127
Plaintiff:
Javier Zubiate
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Robert Marquez, Francisco Jaquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
