Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Alexander v. Myers et al
as 3:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
John Alexander
Defendant:
B. Myers, E. Speck, D. Wiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. SOMMERS et al
as 2:2017cv02621
Petitioner:
GEORGE J. TAYLOR, III
Respondent:
JACK SOMMERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. United States et al
as 1:2013cv01356
Plaintiff:
Everette J. Taylor
Defendant:
United States , Ronnie Holt, Angela P. Dunbar and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TAYLOR
as 2:2012cv02783
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
JOSEPH J. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. VISINSKY et al
as 3:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. VISINSKY, DENISE R. THOMAS, JACK DEPNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Nish
as 1:2011cv00642
Petitioner:
George J. Taylor, III
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and Joseph P. Nish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2010cv01105
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. TAYLOR
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL, JEFFERY A. BEARD, DAVIE DEGUGLEILMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Nish
as 1:2010cv00206
Petitioner:
George J. Taylor, III
Respondent:
Joseph P. Nish and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown et al v. Prison Board of Lycoming County et al
as 3:2009cv02131
Plaintiff:
Wendell K. Brown, Kevin Dixon, Fabian Peterkin and others
Defendant:
Prison Board of Lycoming County, Kevin Deparlos and Kimberly Poorman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
