Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Haley v. Cain
as 23-60575
Petitioner / Appellant:
Russell Haley
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Mississippi, Jacqueline Banks and Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Bell v. Gillis et al
as 1:2018cv00246
Defendant:
Michal Hatten, Jacqueline Banks, Misty Rially and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Pushmatahaa Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Banks et al
as 5:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Brooks
Defendant:
Jacqueline Banks, Earnest Lee, Gabiral Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guadiana v. Banks et al
as 1:2018cv00121
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Guadiana
Defendant:
Jacqueline Banks and Ronald Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Banks et al
as 3:2017cv00866
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Powell
Defendant:
Jacqueline Banks , United States Bureau of Prison(s) and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randy Williams v. Jacqueline Banks, et al
as 17-60716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY C. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELINE BANKS, Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution Superintendent, RON KING, Superintendent, HUBERT DAVIS and others
Tommy White v. Jacqueline Banks, et al
as 17-60645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY DEMINTO WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELINE BANKS, MARSHALL TURNER, HUBERT DAVIS and others
Espinoza v. Banks
as 1:2017cv00208
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Espinoza
Defendant:
Jacqueline Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demario Walker v. Johnathan Hunt, et al
as 17-60511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMARIO DONTEZ WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNATHAN D. HUNT, Correction Integrity Investigator, MARSHALL FISHER, MARSHALL TURNER and others
Weathington v. Mills et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lee Weathington
Defendant:
Andrew Mills, Timothy Barnes, Jacqueline Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
