Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Crawford v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Timothy Crawford
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, O.D.O.C., Sgt. Washburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
French v. Roberts et al
as 2:2021cv01816
Plaintiff:
Jim French
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, S. Johston, D. Vetlanfer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty v. Patton et al
as 2:2021cv01723
Plaintiff:
Kevin Daugherty
Defendant:
Dr. Mark Patton, TLC Board, Dr. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lima-Flores v. Underhill et al
as 2:2021cv01141
Plaintiff:
Santos A. Lima-Flores
Defendant:
Mr. Underhill, Mr. E. Shaw, Dorothy Wettlaufer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv00487
Defendant:
Dawnell Meyer, Jane/John Doe, Anthony Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. McGee et al
as 2:2020cv01782
Defendant:
Susan Washburn, Jane & John Does, Lt. D. Lindholm and others
Plaintiff:
Santos L. Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgell v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv01917
Defendant:
John 1-10 Doe, Oregon Department of Corrections (O.D.O.C.), Thomas Bristol and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Sturgell, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01081
Defendant:
Mr. Geeir, Colette S. Peters, Dr. Peng and others
Plaintiff:
Rico Carlos Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Myrick et al
as 2:2015cv01449
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, John Myrick and Steve Shelton, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Sean P. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamb v. Taylor et al
as 2:2014cv00909
Defendant:
Cpl. Clauser, Jane/John Does 1-9, Steve Franke and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Gordon Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
