Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gibson v. Reardon et al
as 9:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
David Gibson
Defendant:
Patrick Reardon, John Doe, "John Doe" Kerpieck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Coleman v. Milwaukee County Jail, et al
as 22-2064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN K. COLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY JAIL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HONZIK, CAPTAIN BRIGGS and others
Phillips v. Doe A et al
as 9:2019cv00383
Plaintiff:
Marquis Phillips
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Robert Schramm, Troy Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zimmerman v. Jess et al
as 2:2018cv01805
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Jane Doe B, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Diane M. Zimmerman and Diane M Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Theriault et al
as 9:2018cv01067
Defendant:
John Doe "E", John Doe "D", Nurse Jane Doe "A" and others
Plaintiff:
Elijha Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROOKS v. JONES et al
as 3:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
THERENCE W CROOKS
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, RICK SCOTT, SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrelli v. New York City, et al
as 1:2015cv00161
Plaintiff:
Albert Ferrelli
Defendant:
New York City, New York City D.O.C., Jane Doe (A) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Kreke et al
as 3:2013cv01097
Plaintiff:
Dennis K Parker
Defendant:
Mike Kreke, Jane Doe A, Jane Doe B and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Tate et al
as 3:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Shawn Hill
Defendant:
W. E. Tate, Corban, John Doe (A) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seymore v. New York CIty et al
as 7:2012cv07117
Plaintiff:
Maurice Seymore
Defendant:
New York CIty, New York Dept. Ciiy Correction Services, Jane Doe-A and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
