Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Jean Merilien v. Warden
as 23-12501
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
MERILIEN v. DUNAGAN et al
as 5:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DUNAGAN, WARDEN LAWRENCE WITTINGTON, DOCTOR OMER AHMED ALJAAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merilien v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2019cv05750
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles and Milton Buddy Nix
Petitioner:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Merilien v. Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv04853
Defendant:
Alisha Adam Johnson and Tom Brewer
Plaintiff:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERILIEN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv01039
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP and TRUMP'S CORPORATION INC.
Plaintiff:
JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERILIEN v. SINGLETON et al
as 5:2019cv00124
Defendant:
WARDEN ARTIS SINGLETON, CAMPBELL, DOCTOR LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merilien v. Hurst et al
as 3:2018cv00056
Defendant:
Mr. Cert. Officer Scott, Shawn Emmons, Mr. Cert. Sergeant Hurst and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MERILIEN v. BRYANT et al
as 5:2018cv00239
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, UNIT MANAGER ROZIER, UNIT MANAGER WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merilien v. Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
as 1:2018cv03241
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
Plaintiff:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merilien v. Siedentopf, Esq. et al
as 1:2018cv02230
Plaintiff:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Defendant:
Sarah E. Siedentopf, Esq. , Tina Robinson , Unknown Named Clerk of Fulton County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
