Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Sanchez v. Colvin et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Dajohn Sanchez
Defendant:
John Colvin, Nurse Five Points Perez, John Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Colvin et al
as 1:2023cv09514
Plaintiff:
Dajohn Sanchez
Defendant:
John Colvin, Nurse Five Points Perez, John Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witherspoon v. Colvin
as 23-570
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jerome Witherspoon
Respondent / Appellee:
John Colvin
Favourite v. Colvin
as 23-364
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rivin Favourite
Respondent / Appellee:
John Colvin, Superintendent at Five Points Correctional Facility
Powell v. Colvin
as 1:2023cv01249
Petitioner:
Howard Powell
Respondent:
John Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loving v. Superintendent
as 23-131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Franklin Loving
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Morton, Acting Superintendent of Downstate Corr. Facility
Defendant:
Superintendent, Downstate Correctional Facility, M.D. John or Jane Doe, Noriel DeGuzman, Physician Assistant, Downstate Corr. Facility and others
Bryant v. NY State Dept of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Raquise Bryant
Defendant:
NY State Dept of Corrections and Community Supervision, John Colvin and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trapani v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv00681
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Robert Cunningham and John Colvin
Plaintiff:
Damian R. Trapani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Colvin
as 6:2021cv06157
Defendant:
John Colvin
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv01417
Defendant:
Joseph Bellnier, Matthew Thoms, Donald Venettozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Wonder Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
