Prisoner Petitions Cases
XENOS v. MORAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv03676
Plaintiff: JOSE FREMONDE XENOS
Defendant: WILLIAM F. MORAN, MATTHEW POTTS and PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
XENOS v. MORAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03586
Plaintiff: JOSE FREMONDE XENOS
Defendant: WILLIAM F. MORAN, NORTHAMPTON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, TODD BUSKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
XENOS v. BUSKIRK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03018
Plaintiff: JOSE FREMONDE XENOS
Defendant: TODD L. BUSKIRK, EDWARD G. SMITH and GAIL VAN ZELT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
XENOS v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2009cv02205
Petitioner: JOSE FREMONDE XENOS
Respondent: TODD L. BUSHKIRK and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
XENOS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2009cv01560
Petitioner: JOSE FREMONDE XENOS
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
XENOS v. MORGANELLI
as 5:2008cv02032
Plaintiff: JOSE FREMONDE XENOS
Defendant: JOHN MORGANELLI
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jose Xenos v. Todd Buskirk, et al
as 08-1699
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSE FREMONDE XENOS
Defendant: TODD BUSKIRK, DA NORTHAMPTON CTY and ATTY GEN PA
XENOS v. BUSKIRK et al
as 2:2007cv02281
Petitioner: JOSE FREMONDE XENOS
Respondent: TODD L. BUSKIRK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COMMONWEALTH v. XENOS
as 2:2007cv02034
Petitioner: COMMONWEALTH
Respondent: JOSE FREMONDE XENOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?