Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Baker v. Bolling
as 1:2017cv00389
Petitioner:
Sidney James Baker
Defendant:
Leon Bolling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00439
Plaintiff:
Michael James Baker
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Christopher Gordy, Luther Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2011cv02777
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daryl Knight
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell, James Baker and Anthony Johnson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2011cv02692
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Horton
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell and James Baker
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Baker et al
as 5:2011cv00564
Plaintiff:
Waylen Craig Bradford
Defendant:
James Baker, Tom Watson, Courtney Ransom and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boglin v. Baker
as 5:2010cv03569
Plaintiff:
Vincent Earl Boglin
Defendant:
James Baker
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blevins v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2010cv03216
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Blevins
Defendant:
Gene Mitchell, James Baker and Dr Bates
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Baker et al
as 5:2010cv03217
Plaintiff:
Waylen Craig Bradford
Defendant:
James Baker, Tom Watson, Courtney Ransom and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Baker et al
as 5:2010cv03112
Plaintiff:
David Keith Dotson
Defendant:
James Baker, Courtney Ransom, Tom Watson and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satchel v. Lawrence County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2010cv01800
Plaintiff:
Dontae Levar Satchel
Defendant:
Lawrence County Sheriffs Department, James Baker and Gene Mitchell
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
