Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rogers v. Clark County Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv05064
Plaintiff:
Daryl Rogers
Defendant:
Clark County Corrections, Clark County, Clark County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cearley v. Haynes et al
as 3:2021cv05447
Defendant:
Chris Grubb, John Doe 3, Jane Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven C Cearley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe 1 et al v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
Stephen Sinclair and Washington State Department of Corrections
Interested Party:
The McClatchy Company, LLC, Bonneville International, Inc., Andrea Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krier et al v. Fortney et al
as 2:2020cv01073
Defendant:
James Collier, Matthew McCourt, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven James Krier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettys v. Hamil et al
as 3:2020cv05078
Defendant:
Mark McFarland, Elana Lopez, John/Jane Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
John Edward Bettys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2020cv05047
Defendant:
Brad Phillips, Phillip Kuhlman, Kathy Cavanagh and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gene Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Thrasher et al
as 3:2020cv05016
Plaintiff:
Kyntrel Trevyone Jackson and Sinister Daevayasnaham God
Defendant:
Dennis Dahne, Mary J Curry, Stephen Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gough v. Blackham et al
as 2:2019cv00309
Defendant:
Cal Blackham, Mendiola, Heidi Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Drew Richard Gough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Story v. Doe #1 et al
as 2:2018cv00185
Plaintiff:
Marshall L Story
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Amanda LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buck v. Doe
as 2:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Eric Shane Buck
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
