Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Harris #113830 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01905
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv01426
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Maricopa County Superior Court
as 2:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv00212
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
Paul Penzone, Kristin K Mayes and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Gregorio
as 2:2022cv02013
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Unknown Gregorio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv01844
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Maricopa County Superior Court
as 2:2022cv01737
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Maricopa, County of
as 2:2022cv01589
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Penzone et al
as 2:2022cv01571
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris #113830 v. Shinn, et al.
as 2:2022cv00567
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
David C Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
