Cases 1 - 10 of 61
MCKELLOP v. DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner:
JEFFREY A. MCKELLOP
Respondent:
DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COHEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EDDIE ANDERSON, EMERY MCCOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HASHI v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
ISAAC HASHI
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, JEFFREY CLARK, MARK MEADOWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMPHREY v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2021cv03088
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JEFFREY HOWELL, WAYNE BULLINGTON, CYNTHIA KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPALDING v. JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE US et al
as 1:2021cv02182
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. SPALDING
Defendant:
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE US, JEFFREY HOWARD, JASON HAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUARASCIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Defendant:
RJN, JEFFREY ROSEN, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL GUARASCIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTGOMERY v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv03261
Defendant:
ROSALIND SARGENT-BURNS, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LECROY v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv02481
Defendant:
T.J. WATSON, RADM CHRIS A. BINA, JEFFREY E. KRUEGER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LECROY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
MITCHELL v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv02331
Defendant:
ROSALIND SARGENT-BURNS, JEFFREY A ROSEN, T.J. WATSON and others
Plaintiff:
LEZMOND CHARLES MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMSON v. USA
as 1:2020cv01908
Petitioner:
JEFFREY HENRY WILLIAMSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
