Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Donald v. Nixon
as 4:2019cv01037
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Donald
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald et al v. Nixon et al
as 4:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Donald and Tina M Donald
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Todd M. Schultz and Jackson County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Campbell, III v. Mike Sharp, et al
as 16-1865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Sharp, Jackson County Sheriff, Jane Doe #1, Jackson County Deputy Sheriff, John Doe #1, Jackson County Deputy Sheriff and others
Campbell v. Sharp et al
as 4:2015cv00745
Plaintiff:
Harry G Campbell, III
Defendant:
Mike Sharp, Jane Doe # 1, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Nixon
as 2:2015cv04147
Plaintiff:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howdeshell v. Lombardi et al
as 6:2015cv03062
Plaintiff:
Charles D Howdeshell
Defendant:
George A Lombardi, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Michael Bowersox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garvey Perkins-Bey v. Callahan et al
as 2:2014cv04312
Plaintiff:
Mack Moziah Garvey Perkins-Bey
Defendant:
Richard G Callahan, Jay Cassady, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Holder et al
as 2:2013cv04286
Plaintiff:
Sean T Wright
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Mike Oliver, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garvey Perkins-Bey v. Callahan et al
as 2:2013cv04259
Plaintiff:
Mack Moziah Garvey Perkins-Bey
Defendant:
Richard G Callahan, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Terry Atchenson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garvey Perkins-Bey v. Callahan et al
as 2:2013cv04233
Plaintiff:
Mack Moziah Garvey Perkins-Bey
Defendant:
Richard G Callahan, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Terry Atchison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
