Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
LARRY J WILLIAMS and LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA JACKSON COUNTY and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2019cv00543
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2019cv04665
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00041
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PANE
Plaintiff:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2018cv00280
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LATOYA MASSEY and CONNIE F PITTS
Plaintiff:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Catron et al
as 2:2018cv00414
Plaintiff:
Jerome William Wagner
Defendant:
Chris Catron, Brian L. Masony, Carole Depass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Laflen et al
as 2:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jerome William Wagner
Defendant:
Bruce Laflen, Brian L. Masony, L. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Secretary for DCF et al
as 2:2017cv00723
Plaintiff:
Jerome William Wagner
Defendant:
Secretary for DCF, Brian L. Masony, Donald Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 3:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
LARRY JEROME WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC, GEO CARE INC and REGULO CALAYCAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2015cv00155
Petitioner:
CARLOS JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
