Cases 1 - 10 of 19
HUGHES v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv02573
Plaintiff:
TAHVON HUGHES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFFREY BASCOMB, JESSIE WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwager v. Norristown State Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv03978
Plaintiff:
Brian Charles Schwager
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL and Jessie Keith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CRAWLEY v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv00106
Petitioner:
JESSIE CRAWLEY
Respondent:
ERIC ARMEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitaker et al v. SCI Camp Hill Correction
as 1:2020cv00117
Defendant:
SCI Camp Hill Correction
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hernandez and Damion Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordon v. Ebbert et al
as 4:2019cv01472
Defendant:
Mr. Watson, K. Sorce, D. Andrew Edringer and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen L. Jordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBINSON v. KIRSCH et al
as 5:2019cv00953
Defendant:
LEONA, JESSIE KIRSCH, MITZI MONTZ and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Edinger et al
as 3:2018cv02251
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Defendant:
SIA Fosnut, Dr. Parness, Jessie Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARTIN v. WARDEN OF F.C.I. MCKEAN-CAMP
as 1:2018cv00358
Defendant:
WARDEN OF MCKEAN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
JESSIE L. MARTIN, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN OF F.C.I. MCKEAN-CAMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reid v. Inch et al
as 3:2018cv02101
Defendant:
Mark Inch, John Doe #5, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon C. Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARTIN v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2018cv00269
Petitioner:
JESSIE L. MARTIN
Respondent:
MARK WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
