Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tragas v. Garrett et al
as 7:2022cv00899
Petitioner:
Joanne Tragas
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Neely, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spencer v. Tuscaloosa County et al
as 7:2021cv01217
Plaintiff:
Clemmie Lee Spencer
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa County, Tuscaloosa Police Department, Joanne Jannik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracewell v. Smith et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00710
Defendant:
Joann Gulidge, Donald Mitchell, Alabama Corrections Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Bracewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2017cv00841
Plaintiff:
Samuel V. Smith
Defendant:
Jimmy Kilgore, Ken Flower, Ron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2017cv00840
Plaintiff:
Seth Adam Thompson
Defendant:
Jimmy Kilgore, Ken Flower, Ron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2017cv00787
Plaintiff:
Dionne C McKinney
Defendant:
Jimmy Kilgore, Joann Liner, Cotney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Temple v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2017cv00638
Plaintiff:
Chancey Berry Temple
Defendant:
Jimmy Kilgore, Ken Flower, Ron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Chambers County Detention Facility et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2016cv00944
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Moss
Defendant:
Chambers County Detention Facility, Melody Nutt, Nurse Jo Jo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Felton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00633
Plaintiff:
Stacey JoAnn Cobb
Defendant:
Mrs. Felton, Gwendolyn Tarrance, Captain Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Wheeler-White et al
as 1:2009cv00344
Petitioner:
Farrah JoAnn Garza
Respondent:
Cynthia S. Wheeler-White and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
