Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Shoate et al v. Doe et al
as 4:2013cv00683
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Shoate, Jr. and Ruby E. Shoate
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe, John 3 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemaker v. Merritt et al
as 6:2013cv03115
Plaintiff:
Walter C. Shoemaker
Defendant:
Wayne Merritt, John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Mattivi et al
as 4:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Adrian L. Dunn, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael Mattivi, John 1 Doe and John 2 Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Herrington v. Nixon et al
as 5:2013cv06022
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, George Lombardi, MO Board of Probation & Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Snodgrass et al
as 4:2012cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W Singleton
Defendant:
Ron Snodgrass, St. Clair County, John 1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kobel v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2011cv04223
Plaintiff:
Scott Harris Kobel
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Corizon, Missouri Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Meyers et al
as 5:2011cv06033
Plaintiff:
David E. Bailey
Defendant:
Timothy Meyers, John #1 Doe, John #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Bustillo et al
as 6:2010cv03326
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, John Doe, Michael K Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pryor-Kendrick v. Epperson et al
as 3:2010cv05056
Plaintiff:
Theresa CW Pryor-Kendrick
Defendant:
Mark Epperson, David Snook, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bluford et al
as 4:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
Reginald E Jones
Defendant:
John Bluford, Dana Thompson, Larry Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
