Cases 1 - 10 of 31
John Hunter v. Macon SP Warden, et al
as 24-11659
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA and MACON SP WARDEN
Petitioner:
JOHN A. HUNTER
John Hunter v. Macon SP Warden, et al
as 24-10082
Petitioner:
JOHN A. HUNTER
Respondent:
MACON SP WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Hunter v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01841
Petitioner:
John Thomas Hunter, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUNTER v. LAWSON et al
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
JOHN A HUNTER
Defendant:
MALISA LAWSON and GA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Lawson et al
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
John A. Hunter
Defendant:
Malisa Lawson and Ga. Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Pike County, Kentucky et al
as 7:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
John C. Hunter
Defendant:
Pike County, Kentucky, Brian Morris, James Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Smith
as 1:2022cv04240
Petitioner:
John A. Hunter
Respondent:
Warden C. Smith and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Smith
as 1:2022cv03904
Petitioner:
John A. Hunter
Respondent:
Warden L. Smith and State of Georgia Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Harris et al
as 1:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
John A. Hunter
Defendant:
Melvin Harris, Addoniss C. Gibson, Jr., Jonathan R. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Unknown Correctional Officers employed at Wilcox State Prison
as 2:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
John A. Hunter
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officers employed at Wilcox State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
