Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Foy v. Ault et al
as 4:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
Earl Foy, Jr
Defendant:
John Ault, Dave DeGrange and Traci Dow-Wyatt
Respondent:
David Larson
Interested Party:
William A. Hill and H. Loraine Wallace
Plaintiff:
Earl Lee Foy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foy v. Ault et al
as 5:2022cv04032
Plaintiff:
Earl Foy, Jr
Defendant:
John Ault, Dave DeGrange, David Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Whalen et al
as 4:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Rebecca Bowker, Douglas Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
William Simpson Edwards
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foy v. DeGrange et al
as 5:2015cv04245
Plaintiff:
Earl Foy, Jr
Defendant:
Dave DeGrange, John Ault and Jim Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pete Alspach, et al v. John Baldwin, et al
as 14-3316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pete Alspach and Joel Smitherman
Defendant - Appellee:
John Baldwin, Nicholas Ludwick, John Ault and others
James Bey, III v. John Ault
as 13-2736
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Hayes Bey, III
Respondent - Appellee:
John Ault, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary
Eric Thompson, et al v. John Ault, et al
as 13-2071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Mel Thompson, Katie Beglin, formerly known as Katie Thompson and Delores Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Ault, Warden, William Sperfslage, Deputy Warden, Deb Nichols, Security Director and others
Lindemann v. Tadman et al
as 4:2013cv00182
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Jorge Lindemann
Defendant:
David Tadman, John Ault and Iowa State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Houston v. John Ault
as 12-3606
Petitioner - Appellant:
Joseph Houston
Respondent - Appellee:
John Ault
Enrique Garcia v. John Ault
as 12-3480
Petitioner - Appellant:
Enrique Aboytes Garcia
Respondent - Appellee:
John Ault, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
