Cases 1 - 10 of 499
Vick v. Temple et al
as 3:2024cv00662
Defendant:
Anthony Johnson, Sgt. Smith, Officer Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Nazeer Dijon Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosser v. Gardner et al
as 7:2024cv00617
Defendant:
D.C. Gardner, John Doe and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Sean K. Rosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00608
Defendant:
Correctional Officer John Doe #2, Correctional Officer Edwards, Nurse Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Jordan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Phipps et al
as 7:2024cv00586
Defendant:
John Doe, Lt. Fleming, R.O.C. Gregory Hollaway and others
Plaintiff:
Destined George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zeno v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00573
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Williams, Larry Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Zeno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01481
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Clive Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shouse v. Caudill et al
as 7:2024cv00520
Defendant:
Caudill, Caudwell and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Jacob Alan Shouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varner v. Leu et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Defendant:
Warden Leu, Captain Rosencrance, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Bowman v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00475
Defendant:
B. Steffey, Johnny Hall, Jordan Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lowel Bowman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Leu et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Defendant:
Jane Doe 4, John Doe 3, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Hosea Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
