Cases 1 - 10 of 331
Dailey v. Arens et al
as 3:2024cv03120
Plaintiff:
Corey Dailey
Defendant:
. Arens, . Zanger, J Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newcomb v. Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Dyron S. Newcomb
Defendant:
Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Lutz et al
as 2:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Nicole Lutz, Champaign County, Illinois, Dustin Heuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Doe I et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe II and FNU Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv14001
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Howard Wesley
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II and Officer A. Grisheimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Howard Wesley
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II and A. Grisheimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Scott et al
as 3:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
James Owens
Defendant:
. Scott, . Bradshaw, . Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins, Leo, Man and others
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, John Doe, I, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 23-12959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE, I and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
