Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Pittman v. Conejo et al
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Joe Chuck Pittman
Defendant:
Conejo, Lake County Jail, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flohr v. Jeff Siegel et al
as 3:2024cv00415
Defendant:
ROBERT FLOHR, Elkhart County Sheriff Jeff Siegel, John Does/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLDER v. SIMONS et al
as 1:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
DAVID TRA-VON HOLDER
Defendant:
SIMONS, MARION COUNTY ADC SUPERVISORS and JOHN DOE/JANE DOE (ETL) 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. FRANKLIN et al
as 1:2022cv02244
Plaintiff:
KEITH LEE BRYANT
Defendant:
ANDREA FRANKLIN, CONSTANCE SCHMITT, KEITH HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greenwell v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
Reginald Greenwell, Jr
Defendant:
David Gladieux and John Does/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Kroemer et al
as 1:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
Reginald Baker
Defendant:
Corporal Kroemer, Keely Davis, Robert Glasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Meade et al
as 3:2014cv01669
Defendant:
Darcy Meade, Cory LNU and John Does/Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Jason L Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Himelick et al
as 1:2014cv00050
Defendant:
Darrell Himelick, Kathy Lee, Captain Albertson and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Fries et al
as 1:2013cv00359
Plaintiff:
David Weaver
Defendant:
Ken Fries, Tina Kefaber, Jacob E Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2013cv00160
Defendant:
DENISE BROOKS, CLARK COUNTY JAIL NURSES ____ BROOKS AND MIKE _____, CLARK COUNTY JAIL STAFF JOHN DOES/JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
