Cases 1 - 10 of 580
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
NICK D. PAYNE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, IDOC, C.I.C. PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN, FLOWER'S DORM REP, CO'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayberry v. Buss et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Defendant:
Edwin G Buss, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flohr v. Jeff Siegel et al
as 3:2024cv00415
Defendant:
ROBERT FLOHR, Elkhart County Sheriff Jeff Siegel, John Does/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. EMERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEREMY STONE
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SNODGRASS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HERNANDEZ v. ANONYMOUS HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
Anonymous Health of Indiana, LLC, Jane Doe, R.N., John Doe, M.D. and others
SMITH v. ALABI et al
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
CADEN LEE SMITH
Defendant:
G. ALABI and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lairson v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Eric Lairson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Christina Reagle, Jacqueline Mayes and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
