Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Demos v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
USA and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KOFFLER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT KOFFLER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN BEN FORD, NICHOLAS STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koffler v. Ward et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
John Robert Koffler
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Warden Ben Ford, Nicholas Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koffler v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
John Robert Koffler
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Ben Ford, Nicholas Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canning v. Carroll County Sheriff Dept.
as 3:2021cv00014
Defendant:
Carroll County Sheriff Dept., Terry Langley and Correct Health
Plaintiff:
John Robert Canning, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos v. The U.S. et al
as 4:2020cv00104
Defendant:
Wash, D.C., The U.S.A. and The U.S.
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Williams et al
as 1:2020cv01705
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester and J-Rock
Respondent:
B. Stirling, R. B. Harwell, S. C. Admin. Law Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shingleton v. Anderson et al
as 6:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Cpl. Perkins, Asst. DA Daffney Black, Atty Chief Council Steven Yekell and others
Plaintiff:
Isiah Shingleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REGISTER v. USA
as 7:2019cv00062
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT REGISTER, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DEMOS v. THE HERSHEYCOMPANY et al
as 5:2016cv00468
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant:
THE HERSHEYCOMPANY, MARS INC, DR PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
